When you submit your research paper to a journal, there is a good chance that it will be rejected. In fact, the chances of rejection are high enough that it is not uncommon for journal editors to consider the number of submissions they receive as a measure of success. Most journal editors are not looking for perfection—they are looking for papers that are interesting and provide some new information.
However, if you have been rejected from publication, it is important to understand what went wrong with your paper so that you can make improvements before submitting again. Here are seven parameters shared by top dissertation writing services that you should consider when resubmitting your rejected research paper.
Technical improvement
The first parameter that you need to focus on to improve your rejected research paper is related to technical things. The whole editorial office will check your manuscript before it goes to the managing editor or editor-in-chief. At this stage, the research paper gets rejected because of the following technical reasons:
- Your paper has plagiarized text. Copy paste someone else’s work without giving due credit is considered a high academic offence.
- You have submitted your journal to multiple journals. Journals do not allow submitting your manuscript at multiple places.
- There are mistakes in the key elements of your manuscript, such as in tables, figures, references, main text, affiliations, list of authors and title.
- Your manuscript lacks quality language and is not according to the journal’s standards.
- Figures and tables in the manuscript are not captioned as per journal guidelines
- Your paper is not according to the guidelines of the journal.
Above are the technical things you need to focus on to improve the quality of your rejected paper. Find out whether or not any of the above things exits in your manuscript. If there are any, try to remove them. This will make your manuscript free from technical errors.
Aim and scope
Another parameter to improve a rejected research paper is to focus on the aims and scope. Many times, a manuscript gets rejected because it does not work according to the aims and scope of the journal. Your paper needs to be of value or interest to the journal’s audience. Otherwise, it is highly unlikely that your paper will be accepted. That is why analyze the aims and scope of your research paper and then read the scope of the published paper in the journal. This will help you ensure that your aims and scope are according to your journal’s nature. If your work is not according to the journal you want to publish, then it is best to look for another journal or change the scope of your paper.
Importance of research
Another parameter for the improvement of a rejected research paper is the significance of your research. Your research paper can easily get rejected if your research topic is not very significant. It might be that the paper’s findings are not impactful and do not contribute to the academic field in any way. Thus, the topic of your research paper needs to be according to the interests of the journal’s audience. Also, it needs to contribute to the academic field. You can discuss the research ideas with your friends, teachers or any other professional person in your field to do your research.
Analysis of the research
The next thing you need to improve in the rejected research paper is the analysis part. Your paper might get rejected because the journal might have found mistakes in the analysis and presentation. Your major mistakes may be because of a lack of clarity in comparison metrics or control groups. Lack of clarity can lead to the deterioration of your analysis. This way, your research will not give any quality content which can attract the journal for publishing. To improve your analysis, it is best to look for small mistakes, such as using incorrect terms in the analysis. Make sure that you have a clear framework in your analysis.
Writing and language issues
While improving the rejected research paper, writing and language are also important. You need to make your research paper of good quality in terms of the structure of the paper, language, spelling and writing. Without this, there is a high chance that the journal will not accept your paper. To improve the language and writing of your paper, getting feedback from others before submitting your paper is best. It is because getting a second opinion can aid you in looking for mistakes you might have overlooked. There are also many editing tools available online that you can use to improve your writing and language in the paper. You can also get professional editing services.
Design of the study
The study’s design is a very important parameter in improving the rejected research paper. Flaws in the study design are a very common reason for rejection. Many researchers use a very wrong approach from the beginning. For instance, they contain research questions poorly formulated and unclear methodology. To improve the study’s design, you should consider the samples and responses of participants, the relevance of your analysis, and the reliability and validity of the tests. You cannot approve your paper without making your study design clear and effective.
Findings of the research
The last parameter to make rejected research paper better is related to the findings or conclusion of the research. Flaws in the findings or conclusions are common reasons for rejection. It would help if you gave meaningful findings at the end. Your arguments should be valid, structured, and logical so that they can support the thesis of your whole paper effectively. Your manuscript will never be accepted for publication if the findings do not manifest a meaningful insight.
Conclusion
The above guide can help you publish your rejected research paper in your desirable journal. The only thing you need to do is to improve your paper by using the above mentioned seven parameters. Look for the technical mistakes and make the scope of your study according to the journal’s audience. Your research paper will be accepted easily if you improve your study design, analysis and methodology.
